Emigres from less conservative climes find the Rochester newspapers conspicuously lacking in any semblance of metropolitan journalism. They find it far simpler to compare them with the weekly newspapers of the small town -- only with more advertising. Robust phrasing, critical estimates of civic efforts, personalities, or mores, are frowned upon. [...]
They are without serious competition. There is no necessity to crusade and therefore increase reader interest and circulation. Thus they content themselves with the role of mere documentation. As one critic puts it -- "The dullest stuff from the AP wires (all of which you heard on the eleven p.m. newscasts the night previous), a puff for the Republican administration, a report on the activities of four garden clubs, the list of speeders and four columns of obituaries."This quote is from the book Smugtown, U.S.A, published 50 years ago by Rochester newspaperman and gadfly Curt Gerling. When he wrote, Rochester was a prosperous town dominated by Kodak. Much has changed since then. A firm he knew as Haloid, ("obsessed with an idea called 'Xerography' which if you can believe what you hear, is a coming thing") has risen and fallen. Rochester has gone from "safely Republican" ("even the moderately intelligent realize that big business and Republicanism mix even more magnificently than scotch and soda") to a mix of city Democrats and county Republicans.
This estimate is more accurate than cruel. Fortunately for those who must read the customary comics and day's inaccurate weather forecast, [...] there is one rewarding feature -- both newspapers have fast-moving, easy-reading and nearly complete sports coverage.
Whatever may be the weakness of the Gannett publications as newspapers, they are still a monopoly and as such we are stuck with them. [...] [T]oo often what seems like news to them is not news to the national radio or television commentators nor the New York Times. Rochester has not only learned to live with it but expects it.Though Rochester is feeling less smug nowadays, I don't think its main newspaper has gotten the message. I'm not deluded enough to believe I can change the D&C, but I hope to point out how it could change, and why the 29th deserves better.
Hello. This is a call from American Family Voices, 202-293-1128. Congressman Randy Kuhl has allowed China to import unsafe products to our nation by underfunding our inspection agencies and allowing corporations from around the world to import goods to America without proper oversight. Pet foods that harm pets. Toothpaste that contains antifreeze. Even children's toys that use lead paint. While our trade deficit soars, and the holiday season approaches, Congressman Kuhl's unsafe products keep coming in from China. This is dangerous, and it's costing us thousands of middle-class jobs and putting our children at risk. Call Congressman Kuhl at 607-776-9142 and tell him to put America first.This is the third set of robo-calls from this group. S-CHIP and possible war with Iran were the subjects of earlier robo-calls. According to the non-partisan Public Citizen organization, American Family Voices is a 501(c)(4) funded mainly by AFSCME.
The goal is, or at least should be, to begin moving in a direction that will allow greater control by the Iraqi government and people. Engaging in power struggles over funding, especially symbolic ones, for the remainder of Bush's presidency will be time wasted.The first sentence is the most important one in the whole editorial, and it's a key point that's missed by those who tout the military progress being made in Iraq. To date, military progress hasn't led to any appreciable political progress. The political apparatus that we've installed there hasn't been able to assert "greater control", because they're unwilling to make the compromises and deals necessary to form a viable central government. This was true last year when violence was higher in Iraq, and it's true this Fall when violence has lessened.
Senior military commanders here now portray the intransigence of Iraq's Shiite-dominated government as the key threat facing the U.S. effort in Iraq, rather than al-Qaeda terrorists, Sunni insurgents or Iranian-backed militias.