Yesterday's results in New Hampshire have Eric Massa fired up and ready to go.
Massa started with three points:
1. The New Hampshire turnout is good news for Democrats. Most of the
increase in turnout was among Independents and Democrats.
We are energized. People in this country are absolutely at wits end
and fed up with politics as usual in Washington, DC. The go along to
get along, good old boy network is not resonating with the American
people. Washington DC is broken, and to fix it we have to change it.
2. Randy Kuhl is swimming against this tide. Evidence for this
includes his "disingenuous, dishonest and incredibly
negative writings
in local newspapers, and his spending of hundreds of thousands of
dollars of taxpayers' money to sent out
glossy two-sided mailers."
Massa's objection to the mailer is that Kuhl's claim that "No child in
New York should ever have to live without health coverage" is
contradicted by his actions: "He took millions of dollars off of the
table. Four million children were blocked from getting access to
health care."
3. Kuhl's editorial calling the 110th Congress the "Post Office"
Congress didn't acknowledge that Kuhl himself
sponsored a bill in the
109th Congress to rename the Scio Post Office after Congressional
Medal of Honor winner Jason Dunham. "Frankly, that's a wonderful
thing to do [...] I think it's wonderful that we honor our local
heroes."
Massa concluded by noting:
I'm going to center my campaign on what we believe in and what we
stand for. But I cannot help but point out, and it must be pointed
out, that who we have representing us today is a classic example of
what is wrong in Washington. Washington is broken, and Randy Kuhl is
one of those broken pieces.
After the intro, Rick Miller of the Olean Times-Herald asked some
questions about the primaries. The net of them was that Massa is
going to vote for Hillary, he doesn't officially endorse anyone, and
his supporters are backing different candidates but are unified in
their support of Massa.
Bob Recotta of the Corning Leader asked Massa about the perception on
the part of the public that Congress is part of the problem, as
evidenced by polls. How can the leading Democratic candidates, who are all
former or current Senators, distance themselves from that perception?
Massa said that the candidates should
tell people that they need to change Congress. When a sitting Member
of Congress calls his colleagues a 'Post-Office Congress' but he's one
of the guys setting up a bill naming a Post Office, then he's part of
the problem. We need people to work across party lines. I used to be
a Republican. I'm bi-lingual. I speak donkey and elephant, eat
carrots and peanuts. We need to elect people who don't judge their
fellow Americans by the party they're part of.
Recotta also asked how Massa's campaign will tap into the energy
coming from the Presidential contest.
I like to think some of that energy is coming from our campaign.
We're like a can of Coke that's been shook up. We see more
volunteers, more activity and more excitement. I don't think it's an
Iowa or New Hampshire phenomenon -- it's a national phenomenon.
Rob Montana of the Hornell Evening Tribune asked what Massa's biggest
problem was with Kuhl's editorial.
Massa said that the easiest way to
see what was wrong with the editorial was to set it beside his
New
Year's message. Massa contrasted his "clear message of what I stand
for" with Kuhl's negativity.
Massa also noted that "it's wrong for a Member of Congress to misuse
his position to attack the other side for actions he took", referring
to the Post Office naming.
I asked Massa his take on the Republican talking point that the surge
is working and that it won't be an issue in the '08 election.
My answer is great, time to leave. I was not in favor of going into
Iraq, and I continue to be in opposition to our occupation in Iraq.
We were sold a bill of goods. We were told there would be a Summer
surge. Last time I checked, there was snow outside, and Iraqi
soldiers were shooting American soldiers in the back.
The surge was supposed to create a functioning Iraqi democracy. That
hasn't happened. It's time for us to look at the President and say
'You don't get to keep 150,000 Americans in Iraq.'