The House
just passed an amendment to the Senate Amendment to the Protect America Act that strips out immunity for telecommunications providers. Instead, the new provision allows a secure court to review evidence explaining why telecoms provided wiretaps for the government without proper authorization.
The Republicans pulled out the stops, procedural and rhetorical, to pass this bill with immunity intact. Today, the House had a secret session for the first time in 25 years, where Republicans tried to explain why retroactive immunity is necessary. Last month, they
walked out of the chamber in protest. Back then, Randy Kuhl
posted a blog entry which warned that the expiration of the PAA would have dire consequences for the nation, yet he voted against an extension. Today, President Bush
said that the PAA is needed for "our children to be safe from terror." Bush maintains this line even after repeated audits have shown that the current surveillance powers have been
consistently abused by the FBI.
The Senate could still try to strip out immunity, but it sounds like the House has come to a compromise that might work. Of course, Kuhl voted against it, along with every other Republican in Congress, even though his position a month ago was that we are in dire peril if the PAA isn't passed. He hasn't posted anything on his blog yet, but I'm eager to hear how this vote kept us safer.