Reader Phil Palmesano sent along the full press release from Republican/Conservative party chairs, which is embedded after the break. Their basic argument is that universal health care, which Massa supports, is too expensive and that it will cause an increase in middle-class taxes.
The Kuhl ads on health care and this press release all point to one source, Rep. John Conyers' [D-MI-14] cost-justification for a House bill. The bill, HR 676, has not been specifically endorsed by Massa, who also has his own plan.
It's also unlikely that this bill will be the final form of health care reform that is enacted under an Obama administration (assuming he's elected). Obama's health care plan is much more conservative.
That said, the supposedly scary thing about the bill is the 3.3% payroll tax increase that would fund it. That's $1,200/month for a family making $40,000/year.
Assuming that this family is not insured, they're paying more than that in medical expenses. If they are self-insured, then they are paying more in insurance. If they have employer insurance, their employer will save much more than $1,200, and perhaps they'll stay in business a bit longer to provide that $40,000 paycheck.
So, Conyers' plan, which, again, Massa has never said he supports, doesn't look that scary to me.
Finally, the press release, and Kuhl's ads, claim that the Massa supports health care for illegal immigrants. That's a mis-reading of the bill that Massa doesn't support. It also said that Massa supports limiting doctor choice, which is precisely not what Massa's plan says.
I'd suggest that everyone voting tomorrow who cares about this issue take a look at four things:
Update: Thanks to Meghan Tisinger from Kuhl's office for the correction: Massa does support HR 676.
LOCAL PARTY CHAIRS CRITICIZE ERIC MASSA’S PLAN FOR GOVERNMENT- RUN, SINGLE PAYER HEALTH CARE PLAN
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
CONTACT: PHIL PALMESANO – 607-857-0536
(CORNING, NY) – CHAIRS OF LOCAL PARTY ORGANIZATIONS ANNOUNCED THEIR OPPOSITIONhttp://www.johnmccain.com/content/default.aspx?guid=8475c713-a541-4b97-a2aa-800e35da37bb TO ERIC MASSA’S SUPPORT FOR GOVERNMENT- RUN, SINGLE-PAYER HEALTH CARE PLAN(1).
“ERIC MASSA SUPPORTS A GOVERNMENT RUN HEALTH CARE PLAN THAT WILL ELIMINATE EMPLOYEER-BASED HEALTH INSURANCE PLANS, PUT HEALTH CARE DECISIONS IN THE HANDS OF BUREAUCRATS IN WASHINGTON INSTEAD OF DOCTORS, RATION CARE, LIMIT CHOICE OF DOCTORS, AND PROVIDE FREE HEALTH INSURANCE TO ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS(2)(3),” SAID THE PARTY CHAIRS IN A JOINT STATEMENT. THE PARTY CHAIRS INCLUDE:
DON GWINNER, STEUBEN COUNTY CONSERVATIVE CHAIRMAN
LOUIS DECICCO, CHEMUNG COUNTY CONSERVATIVE CHAIRMAN
LINDA MOORE, SCHUYLER COUNTY CONSERVATIVE CHAIRWOMAN
BILL HATCH, STEUBEN COUNTY REPUBLICAN CHAIRMAN
PHIL BARNES, SCHUYLER COUNTY REPUBLICAN CHAIRMAN
MIKE KRUSEN, CHEMUNG COUNTY REPUBLICAN CHAIRMAN
MATT SHICK, STEUBEN COUNTY INDEPENDENCE PARTY CHAIRMAN
MICHAEL HILLMAN, CHEMUNG COUNTY INDEPENDENCE PARTY CHAIRMAN
PHIL PALMESANO, CORNING CITY REPUBLICAN CHAIRMAN
“MASSA’S PLAN WILL COST TAXPAYERS OVER $1 TRILLION(4), SIGNIFICANTLY INCREASING TAXES, INCLUDING PAYROLL TAXES, COSTING A FAMILY OF FOUR EARNING $40,000/YEAR AN ADDITIONAL $1200/YR IN TAXES(5),” ADDED THE CHAIRS.
“DURING THESE UNCERTAIN ECONOMIC TIMES, WHEN FAMILIES ARE STRUGGLING TO PAY THEIR BILLS, THIS IS NOT THE TIME TO BE INCREASING TAXES AND THAT IS WHAT MR. MASSA IS PROPOSING WITH HIS SUPPORT FOR THIS $1 TRILLION GOVERNMENT-RUN HEALTH CARE PLAN.”
“ERIC MASSA TALKS ABOUT CHANGE, BUT HE IS CHANGE TAXPAYERS JUST CAN’T AFFORD,” THE CHAIRS CONCLUDED.
-30-
SOURCES:
(1) OLEAN TIMES HEARLAD 9/16/08 – MASSA VOWS SUPPORT FOR NATIONAL HEALTH CARE PLAN AND WOULD BACK HR.676 IF ELECTED
(2) WXXI, 9/10/08
(3) SECTION 101 OF HR.676
(4) U.S REP JOHN CONYERS WEBSITE – FINANCING HR.676 http://www.house.gov/conyers/news_hr676_2.shtml
(5) GRAND RAPIDS BUSINESS JOURNAL, 7/18/05 – U.S REP JOHN CONYERS (SPONSOR OF HR. 676) LEGISLATIVE ASSISTANT DISCUSSES HR.676 AND HOW EVERYONE PAYS – “SO IT’S EASY TO FIGURE OUT HOW MUCH EVERYONE IS GOING TO PAY. IF YOU’RE WORKING, YOU JUST DO THE MATH: 3.3 PERCENT (PAYROLL TAX ON ALL EARNINGS) THAT IS YOUR CONTRIBUTION.”
Comments
Its funny how its up to Kuhl's office to make sure you know what you're talking about.
It was nice of Meghan to take time from her busy schedule to correct me. Though I'm sure it was one of the more pleasant parts of her day.
Getting to correct you is always pleasant, though I imagine for the amount of attacks you make on Kuhl and company, it takes too much to actually maintain.
If you can point out any other factually incorrect posts, please feel free to note them here or contact me directly.
You want me to take Meghan's job of babysitting you?
No, I was hoping that you'd back up your assertion with an example or two. Guess that's not going to happen. I have to believe that with over 1100 posts, that you can find at least one more factual inaccuracy.
I guess it just goes to prove that they would rather have the money for war, and not health care.
Hmm,
1 Trillion in spending will cost a family earning 40000 a year an additional 1200 in taxes. Isn't 1 trillion approximately the amount congress gave to wall streeters for causing the latest financial crisis? Hmm, wall street made a couple of trillion in bonuses the last 4-6 years making this mess.
I guess it is highly un-responsible to spend a trillion for the health of our citizens with the way our deficit is going.
Everyone should also realize that it would be a financial disaster if the guys at Goldman don't get their 1-2 million dollar bonuses. Obviously if those guys get less than 500K in bonus then they just won't work and that would freeze wall street and cause too much economic harm so lets give them 1 trillion (maybe they will be nice and return us the money one day).